🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves internationally. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a increasing number of states are considering similar bans.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "robbing our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to implement a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard children from the "influence of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "one of the measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked lawmakers to approve a bill raising the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related step, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has advised guardians to block their children from social media up to the age of 15.

At the EU level, the EU parliament has approved a symbolic statement demanding a ban for under-16s without parental consent is given. While it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A strong age barrier is a solid foundation," stated the European lawmaker supporting the initiative.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the leadership has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but insisting any action must be "based on robust evidence".

Last year, support grew behind a proposal to introduce restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Advocacy groups have voiced apprehensions. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a teenager who was lost after encountering dangerous platform posts contends that a simple age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could create a "dangerous transition" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are appropriate and fit for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

America: A Decentralized Approach

Across America, legislation is primarily unfolding at the state level due to national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a law barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting minors to one hour of social media access per day, with any further time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise introduced bills requiring parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Even with bipartisan support and suggestions from certain individuals to mimic this lead, a US-wide ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Apart from these regions, other nations are similarly taking action.

• The Malaysian government intends to restrict social media for those under sixteen starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, international bodies strike a more nuanced position. Unicef has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could have unintended consequences". The organization points out that social networks can be a "vital connection" for marginalized young people and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

As this global debate continues, the actions of the Australian government and others indicate that policymakers around the world are increasingly content to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.